Previous PageTable Of ContentsNext Page

Aflatoxins and their relationship with sugars in peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.)

A. Manda1, B.P. Naidu1,2, NageswaraRao C. Rachaputi3, Graeme Wright3 and Shu Fukai1

1 School of Land and Food sciences, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD 4072, Australia.
Department of Natural Resources, Mines & Energy, 80 Meiers Rd, Indooroopilly, QLD 4068, Australia.
Queensland Department of Primary Industries, Agency for Food and Fibre Sciences, Farming Systems, Kingaroy, QLD 4610,
Australia. Email


Aspergillus spp. produce aflatoxins in peanut, which poses a health risk to humans and animals, as well as affecting the marketability of peanuts. The current research found that more aflatoxin is produced under rain fed (RF) compared to irrigated (IRR) conditions, and was more predominant in juvenile (R3-5 stage) compared to older (R6-8 stage) pods. No aflatoxin was recorded in marketable pods of the Streeton cultivar in either of the growing conditions, whereas the cultivar NC-7 produced aflatoxin under RF conditions only. Sugars such as glucose, fructose and sucrose were positively correlated with total aflatoxins. It appears that Aspergillus utilises these simple carbohydrates as substrates in biosynthesis of aflatoxins.

Key words

Aflatoxin, sugars, irrigated, rain fed, R- stage


Peanut is a multipurpose crop providing cooking oil and vegetable protein for humans, with haulms consisting of leaves, stems and immature pods being used as cattle feed. Aflatoxin contamination of peanut is a major hazard to human and animal health, and increasingly a major constraint to commercial trading of peanuts. The fungi, Aspergillus parasiticus and A. flavus can infect pods either pre- or post-harvest and produce a particularly lethal toxin known as aflatoxin, which is a secondary metabolite. There are 4 types of aflatoxins (Aft) G1, G2, B1 and B2 and sum of these four is referred to as the total aflatoxin. The USA Food and Drug Administration established 20 ppb as the minimum acceptable level of aflatoxin in all foods other than milk. The European union has banned the import of peanut with >2 ppb of Aft B1 content and with >4 ppb of total aflatoxins in nuts prepared for human consumption. To export tree nuts to the European market, aflatoxin levels should be <3 ppb (Schatzki, 2001). It has been found that simple carbohydrates such as sucrose, glucose and maltose, but not sorbose or lactose, can serve as substrates for the synthesis of aflatoxins (Davis and Diener, 1968; Buchanan and Stahl, 1984).

Most of the research to date to understand the influence of sugars in aflatoxin production has been done under in vitro conditions, however, it is very important to understand the involvement of sugars in the synthesis of aflatoxin under in vivo conditions. The main objectives of this research were to: a) study the effect of pod development stages (R-stages), growing conditions and cultivar on aflatoxin production in peanut and (b) to study the relationship between sugars and aflatoxins under in vivo conditions.

Materials and methods

During the summer of 2001-02, a field experiment was conducted at the J. Bjelke Petersen Research Station in the Kingaroy area of the South Burnett region of S.E. Queensland). Two commercial cultivars ‘Streeton’ and ‘NC-7’ were included in the experiment because Streeton is reputed to have substantial tolerance to aflatoxin contamination compared to the more susceptible NC-7 cultivar, particularly under water stress conditions. Both cultivars were grown under irrigated (IRR) and rain fed (RF) conditions in a split plot design with IRR and RF treatments as main-plots and cultivars as sub-plots with 7 replications. In the IRR treatment, irrigation was provided to maintain non-stressed conditions, via the application of approximately 25,50,40 and 40 mm at 54, 63, 96, 145 DAS (Days After Sowing), respectively. The RF treatment relied on rainfall throughout the growing season, which received 311 mm rainfall. There were 6 dry spells exceeding more than 10 days, which coincided with flowering, pegging and pod filling stages. At maturity (150 DAS), 1.8 m2 of crop was harvested and pods were separated into different R-stages (Boote, 1986). The pod samples were freeze-dried, and R-3 to R-5 stage pods were used as such to make meal, whereas R-6 to R-8 stage pods were shelled and kernels were ground for peanut meal. Aflatoxin analysis was performed using the extraction method of Cole and Dorner (1994), with some modification. One part of peanut meal received 2 parts of (W/V) 80% methanol in centrifuge tubes and tubes were heated in a water bath at 60 oC for 2 hrs to extract aflatoxin. Aflatoxins were resolved using Prevail C-18 HPLC column and UV detected at 365 nm. The mobile phase was water: acetonitrile: methanol at a ratio of 58:21:21. The flow rate was 1.25 mL min-1. Aflatoxins G2, G1, B2, B1 eluted at 8, 10, 12 and 14 minutes, respectively. Prior to statistical analysis, the aflatoxin data was transformed to log form (X +1) (Tubajika and Damann, 2001). However, real values are shown in tables and figures and statistical significance is indicated by letters and asterisks, respectively. The analysis of data was undertaken using the REML package of Genstat 4.2. Sugars (glucose, fructose and sucrose) in peanut pods (R3-5) and kernels (R6-8) were analysed using the HPLC technique of Naidu (1998).


Treatment, cultivar and R-stage differences for aflatoxin production

At the time of harvest total aflatoxin concentration was greater under the RF treatment compared to the IRR treatment (Table 1). There was no significant difference for total aflatoxin between the two cultivars (32.1 vs. 75.4 ppb). The highest level of total aflatoxin was associated with R-4 stage pods. There was a significant interaction between cultivar and irrigation treatment. The cultivar Streeton produced the highest total aflatoxin under RF condition, while total aflatoxin levels for NC-7 were higher under IRR, but not significantly different to Streeton under RF conditions. A similar interaction was observed for R3 to R5 pods but not for pods in the R 6 to 8 stages. In the economically important pods (R6 to R8) there was no aflatoxin in Streeton under either growing environment, whereas NC-7 produced greater levels of total aflatoxins in RF compared to the IRR treatment.

Table. 1. Concentration of total aflatoxins (ppb) in different R-stages at harvest in two cultivars grown under irrigated and rain fed conditions.


IRR growing condition

RF growing condition








R3 pods





59.2 b

R4 pods





213.2 a

R5 pods





42.8 bc

R6 kernels





3.2 d

R7 kernels





1.4 d

R8 kernels





2.7 d


39.4 b

29.9 b

24.8 b

120.8 a


Mean of Growing conditions

34.6 b (IRR)

72.8 a (RF)


Note: Values followed by the same letter are not significantly different (P=0.05)
Differences between the cultivars for components of aflatoxin production

When averaged over all treatments, the major component of total aflatoxin was Aft G2 in Streeton and Aft G1 in NC-7 (Figure 1). Aft G1 was completely absent in Streeton. The contribution of B2 and B1 was not significant to the total aflatoxin in both Streeton and NC-7.

Figure 1. Weighted average of aflatoxin components (ppb) in NC-7 (■) and Streeton (□) at harvest. (ns) non significant; (*) P<0.05; (**) P<0.01

Relationships between sugars and total aflatoxin

Total aflatoxin was significantly and positively correlated with glucose, fructose, and sucrose at harvest time (Table 2). All three sugars were also positively correlated with Aft G2. Aft G1 was positively correlated with fructose only. There was no relationship between Aft B2 and sugars. A significant positive correlation between Aft B1 and sucrose was also found.

Table 2. Correlation coefficients (r) between sugars and aflatoxin components at harvest.





Aft G2




Aft G1




Aft B2




Aft B1








Note: ** - P < 0.01; * - P < 0.05; ns – non significant


In the present experiment aflatoxins were found more under RF conditions compared to the IRR treatment. Under rain fed conditions, higher infection by Aspergillus spp. may have occurred due to poor functioning of the plant immune response and associated reduction in phytoalexin production (Wotton and Strange (1987). Reduced kernel moisture content and water content of the entire plant has been shown to increase the susceptibility of the plant for fungal invasion and hence aflatoxin production (Holbrook et al., 1994b; Cruikshank et al., 2000) Aflatoxin was mostly found in juvenile and immature pods, which also contained high sugar concentrations. This indicates that higher levels of these sugars either enhance fungal infection and/or they serve as important substrates in the biosynthesis of aflatoxin (Buchanan and Stahl, 1984). Cultivar differences in the components of aflatoxin were observed. The fungus A. parasiticus produces all 4 toxin types i.e. afltoxin G1, G2, B2 and B1 whereas A.flavus produces only aflatoxin B2 and B1 (Pitt, 1993). Higher concentrations of all three sugars lead to higher Aft G2 (Table 2). These results indicate that the type of toxin produced by Aspergillus spp may depend on the host cultivar, or alternatively cultivars are preferentially infected by a particular fungal species/strain, which then led to differences in the composition of aflatoxin.

The cultivar NC-7 produced more aflatoxins in mature pods compared to Streeton, which is consistent with previous reports indicating that Streeton possesses a substantial level of tolerance to aflatoxin contamination (Cruickshank et al., 2000). The current research suggests that these cultivar variations may be associated with differences in sugar profiles of maturing pods and their interaction with the aflatoxin producing Aspergillus fungus. Further work is in progress to identify the mechanisms responsible for the genotypic differences for aflatoxin production, particularly in mature pods.


The results of this study demonstrated that aflatoxin production was greater under water limiting conditions compared to irrigated conditions. NC-7, a known aflatoxin susceptible cultivar produced more aflatoxins in the marketable pods than Streeton, which is a renowned drought resistant cultivar. The results suggest that choosing a drought tolerant variety for cultivation under rain fed conditions may significantly minimise the risk of aflatoxin contamination. Aflatoxin is mostly found in the juvenile pods with higher sugar content than mature pods, which contains lower levels of sugar. In future the project is aiming on peanut cultivar differences for sugar composition and aflatoxin production under water stress conditions.


A. Manda acknowledges the financial assistance from ACIAR for the John Allwright Fellowship to do this study, and the 4th International Crop Science Congress for providing funds to attend the conference.


Boote KJ (1982) Growth satges of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Peanut Science 9,35-40.

Buchanan RL and Stahl HG (1984) Ability of various carbon sources to induce and support aflatoxin synthesis by Aspergillus parasiticus Journal of Food Safety 6, 271-279.

Cole RJ, Dorner JW (1994) Extraction of aflatoxins from naturally contaminated peanuts with different solvents and solvent/peanut ratios. Journal of AOAC International 77, 1509 – 1511.

Cruickshank AL, Wright GC, Nageswara Rao Rachaputi (2000) “ Streeton”- An aflatoxin tolerant peanut cultivar for the Australian Industry. American Peanut Research and Education Society Conference, 11-14 July 2000, Point clear Alabama, USA.

Davis ND, Diener UL (1968) Growth and aflatoxin production by Aspergillus parasiticus from various carbon sources. Applied Microbiology 16, 158 – 159.

Holbrook CC, Wilson DW, Rucker KS, Kvien CS, Hook JE, Matheron ME (1994b) Possible role of drought tolerance in reducing aflatoxin contamination of peanut. Proceedings to American Research and Education society.

Naidu BP (1998) Separation of sugars, polyols, proline analogues and betaines in stressed plant extracts by high performance liquid chromatography and quantification by ultra violet detection. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 25, 793 – 800.

Pitt JI (1993) Corrections to species names in physiological studies on Aspergillus flavus and Aspergillus parasiticus. Journal of Food Protection.56, 265 –269.

Schatzki TF (2001) Dependence of aflatoxin in almonds on the type and amount of insect damage. Journal of Agricultural and Food chemistry 49, 4513 – 4519.

Tubajika KM, Damann KE (2001) Sources of resistance to aflatoxin production in maize. Journal of Agricultural and Food chemistry 49, 2652 – 2656.

Wotton HR, Strange RN (1987) Increased susceptibility and reduced phytoalexin accumulation in drought stressed peanut kernels challenged by Aspergillus flavus. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 53, 270 –273.

Previous PageTop Of PageNext Page