Previous PageTable Of ContentsNext Page

Screening of tolerant and susceptible wheat cultivars to waterlogging in the high rainfall zone of the southwest Victoria

Dhananjay Singh1, 2, Malcolm McCaskill2, Kevin F Smith2, and Robert Belford2

1 DNRE, Pastoral and Veterinary Institute, Hamilton, VIC 3300
2 QDPI, Farming Systems Institute, Roma Research Station, Roma, QLD 4455
Dhananjay.Singh@dpi.qld.gov.au

Abstract

Waterlogging is one of the major environmental constraints to the wheat production in the high rainfall zone of the southwest Victoria. A glasshouse experiment was undertaken to identify and compare putatively tolerant and susceptible cultivars, with a more waterlogging-tolerant plant species, triticale. Brookton and Frame found to have the greatest biomass accumulation, whereas Amery, Silverstar and Chara had the lowest biomass accumulation under waterlogged conditions. These cultivars could be selected for further understanding of the mechanisms of tolerance, to waterlogging in this region. The winter wheat cultivars, Tennant and More appeared to be less productive.

Introduction

Waterlogging is one of the major environmental constraints to the wheat production in the high rainfall zone of the southwest Victoria. There is a need of high yielding and tolerant wheat lines for a sustainable and viable wheat industry in the region. In order to develop high yielding cultivars for this environment, it is important to understand the mechanisms of tolerance to waterlogging, so that novel characteristics can be incorporated into the existing high yielding cultivars through breeding. The objective of this experiment was to identify and compare potentially tolerant and susceptible, spring and winter wheat cultivars, with a tolerant line of triticale.

Materials and methods

The experiment was a split-split plot design with four replicates. PVC pots 100 cm long and 8.5 cm diameter were placed in a temperature-controlled glasshouse at the PVI, Hamilton, Victoria. Treatments included factorial combination of 2 waterlogging (waterlogged and control) by 3 harvests (H1, 3 weeks of establishment; H2, 3 weeks of waterlogging and H3, 3 weeks of recovery) by nine varieties (8 wheat, 1 triticale). Six spring wheat cultivars, Amery, Silverstar, Chara, Frame, Carnamah, and Brookton, and two winter wheat cultivars, More and Tennant were compared with a triticale cultivar, Muir. Pots were fertilised with triple superphosphate and Aquasol® for 75 kg N/ha and 20 kg P/ha in liquid form. Aquasol® also provided micronutrients. After two weeks of germination and establishment, pots were thinned to one plant per pot. Plant measurements involved counting of main stem leaf, tiller, seminal and nodal roots, and dry weights of main stem, seminal and nodal root mass at each harvest. Dissolved O2 concentration in the water was also measured at the end of waterlogging period for three depths surface water, 0-5 cm and 5-10 cm depths.

Results

The triticale cultivar, Muir always produced greater biomass than the wheat cultivars at the different harvests (Table 1). Among the wheat cultivars, the spring wheats Brookton and Frame were the highest yielding. Importantly, the relative growth rates of these lines were also greater than the other lines, particularly under the waterlogged conditions. On the other hand, Amery, Silverstar and Chara appeared to be the most susceptible to waterlogging with respect to biomass production in absolute or relative terms. The root: shoot ratio, an important parameter for the waterlogging tolerance was always greater for the winter cultivars, More and Tennant, followed by the Brookton (Table 2). Nodal root mass, another key parameter was always greater for Muir, followed by Brookton. The soil oxygen concentration decreased progressively from a shallower to a deeper depth. At the 5-10 cm depth, oxygen concentrations were consistently less than 11% relative to fully aerated water.

Table 1: Biomass at the harvest 1 (H1), harvest 2 (H2) and harvest 3 (H3). Values in a column with similar letters do not differ significantly (P>0.05).

Cultivar
Biomass (H1)
Biomass (H2)
Biomass (H3)
 

Control (g)

Control (g)

Waterlogged (g)

Control (g)

Recovery (g)

Amery

0.09a

0.35bc

0.28a

0.48a

0.36a

Silverstar

0.10a

0.32ab

0.26a

0.58bc

0.45a

Chara

0.13b

0.45d

0.30a

0.71bc

0.65b

Frame

0.13b

0.50e

0.38b

0.87d

0.72b

Carnamah

0.13b

0.39c

0.36b

0.73bcd

0.49a

Brookton

0.17c

0.51e

0.45c

1.06de

0.74b

More

0.10a

0.28a

0.28a

0.88d

0.49a

Tennant

0.16c

0.34b

0.26a

1.12e

0.65b

Muir

0.20d

0.81f

0.52d

1.36f

0.93c

Table 2: Root: shoot ratio at the harvest 2 (H2) and harvest 3 (H3). Values in a column with similar letters do not differ significantly (P>0.05).

Cultivar
Root: shoot (H2)
Root: shoot (H3)
 

Control (g)

Waterlogged (g)

Control (g)

Recovery (g)

Amery

0.50a

0.30a

0.32ab

0.60b

Silverstar

0.52ab

0.49b

0.35ab

0.24a

Chara

0.66bc

0.40ab

0.45bc

0.33a

Frame

0.47a

0.38ab

0.26a

0.21a

Carnamah

0.74c

0.50cd

0.51cd

0.34a

Brookton

0.80c

0.62cd

0.66d

0.52b

More

1.17d

0.65d

1.49e

1.49c

Tennant

1.29d

0.83e

3.37f

1.82d

Muir

0.73c

0.46b

0.47bc

0.35a

Conclusion

Brookton followed by Frame were found to be the lines most tolerant to waterlogging. On the other hand, Amery, Silverstar or Chara, could be selected as the susceptible lines for further understanding of the mechanisms of tolerance to waterlogging in this region.

Acknowledgment

We acknowledge the funding from the Science and Technology Initiative of the Victorian Government under the project “Overcoming Rootzone Contraints”.

Previous PageTop Of PageNext Page

...

Search Site