Previous PageTable Of ContentsNext Page

RAPESEED RESEARCH REVIEW IN ETHIOPIA

Bulcha Weyessa and Adugna Wakjira

Holetta Agricultural Research Center (EARO), Box 2003, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

Abstract

Argentine rapeseed (Brassica napus) is of recent introduction to Ethiopia about two and a half decades ago. During this period four rapeseed varieties (Target, Tower, Pura and Tower sel.3) were released by a collaborative research with national institutions. Two other varieties (Global No 40619/2 and Consal/1 are also promising for release. Production techniques such as seed rate (12 kg ha-1), sowing time (three weeks after the commencement of the main rains), fertilizer rate of (46/69, N/P2O5) and weed control measures (weeding at 25-30 and 50-60 days after sowing) were determined. The study on relative importance of management factors has revealed that fertilizer was the most critical in the central highlands of Ethiopia followed by early sowing. Further more, important insect pests and diseases of rapeseed were identified of which blackleg disease was found the most limiting factor to production. A possible strategy for increasing the production of the crop was also suggested.

Introduction

Rapeseed and Ethiopian mustard are the third most important oilseeds, after noug (Guizotia abyssinica cass.) and linseed (Linum asitatisimum L.) both in terms of area and production (Table 1). Argentine rapeseed (Brassica napus) is a new Brassica species introduced to Ethiopia in the early 1970s (Hiruy et al., 1983). Research on this crop was started during the same period on materials introduced from Canada and West Germany with main objective of developing high-yielding varieties along with their optimum management practices. The area under Brassica species has increased from 14,000 ha in 1960s to 50,000 ha in 1980s with the release of Pura and Tower varieties. This trend continued for more than 15 consecutive years and rapeseed has been produced mainly on large scale farms almost in a semi-mechanized way (Getinet et al., 1992 and Nigussie A. and Mesfin A. 1994). In 1984, the state farms in south-eastern Ethiopia had 427 ha under rapeseed and increased to 7299 ha in 1988 due to the adoption of new improved varieties and improved management practices (Hiruy and Nigussie 1988).

Productivity of rapeseed under farmers' conditions, however, is very low, in the order of 300-500 kg ha-1 against the 2000-3000 kg ha-1 commonly obtained from large research plots (Hiruy and Nigussie 1988). Such low yields of small farmers are largely accounted to lack of resources for using full packages of recommended practices (Nigussie A. and Mesfin A. 1994). The other problems are insect pests and diseases. Aphid is the most serious insect pest which causes heavy damage to rapeseed crop. Similarly a range of diseases like blackleg, alternaria blight, white rust and downy mildew cause yield losses ranging from 10 to 100% in Ethiopia. Parasitic weed, Orobanche, also causes considerable damage to the crop (Badege et al., 1986). Moreover, bird damage and shattering problems have been contributed a lot to the low yield of rapeseed. This paper, therefore, tries to review past research efforts against these production constraints, indicating future prospects.

RESEARCH ACHIEVEMENTS

Breeding/Selection

Over the past 25 years, the rapeseed-breeding program has made a substantial effort in the identification and release of improved varieties. Four varieties (Pura, Target, Tower and Tower sel.3) have been released (Table 2). These improved varieties were found by selecting from exotic materials. Two other varieties (Global No 40619/2 and Consal/1) are also promising for future release as shown in Tables 3 and 4. Results of the multi-location trials showed that the late maturing Ethiopian mustard (B.carinata) outyielded rapeseed (B.napus) under long seasonal conditions of the Ethiopian highlands (Table 5). On the other hand, the mean oil content of rapeseed was greater than that of the Ethiopian mustard as indicated in Table 6.

Agronomy

Improved cropping systems and other agronomic practices have been developed for different agro-climatic conditions of the country. Fertilizer rate of 46/69 kg/ha of N/P2O5, respectively Table 7; two hand weeding at 25-30 and 50-60 days after sowing and a seed rate of 12 kg/ha were found with the best return of seed yield (Badege et al., 1986 and Taye B. 1986). Higher yields have generally been obtained when sowing was done not later than three weeks after the commencement of the main rains. Thus, optimum sowing date ranges from late May for the high altitude and cool areas of south-eastern zone to early to late June for the central highlands of Ethiopia. Studies on the effects of various technology packages on seed yield of rapeseed have demonstrated that an increase in seed yield ranging from 20 to 29% can be obtained by adoption of full technology package as indicated in Fig.1 (Nigussie A. and Mesfin A. 1994).

Crop protection

Pathological research on rapeseed has revealed 13 fungi, one virus and one bacterium diseases. Of these, leaf and pod-spot (Alternaria brassicae), and blackleg (Leptosphaeria maculans) are most widely distributed. Blackleg, which was observed in the Mid 1970s in some experiment stations, is becoming one of the production limiting factors of rapeseed in Ethiopia.

Future prospects

The increasingly growing demands of oil crops for local consumption, agro-industrial plants and export markets implies the need for stronger research and development efforts towards the improvement of rapeseed in Ethiopia. Hence, due emphasis should be given to select varieties with stable and high yield, better oil content and resistant to diseases and insect pests. Development of low-input technology to serve the need of small scale farmers are also necessary besides the adoption of suitable crop protection measures in response to the rapeseed farming conditions and constraints of farmers.

Table 1. Estimated Area, production and yield of highland oil crops in Ethiopia 1995-97.

Crop

Area ('000 ha)

Production ('000t)

Yield (kg ha-1)

 

1995

1996

1997

1995

1996

1997

1995

1996

1997

Noug

223

250

195

86

84

74

3.85

3.33

3.77

Linseed

113

148

135

57

68

63

5.04

4.59

4.70

Rapeseed

14

21

16

57

68

87

5.04

4.56

5.55

Total

350

419

346

200

220

224

4.64

4.16

4.67

Source: CSA, 1997

Table 2. Seed yield (kg ha-1) and agronomic characteristics of rapeseed genotypes in the national yield trial 1985-1990.

Geno-type

Seed yield

Oil content %

Days to mature

Height(cm)

Year of release

 

F1

F0

F1

F0

F1

F0

F1

F0

 

Target

1769

540

46.9

46.0

137

141

150

126

1976

Tower

1962

859

44.9

44.1

145

146

144

109

1984

Pura

1930

878

44.9

43.4

149

155

154

120

1984

Tower sel.3

2116

930

47.0

45.1

142

150

146

122

1988

Mean

1944

802

45.9

44.7

143

148

149

119

 

Table 3. Mean seed yield (kg ha-1) of all rapeseed varieties tested at five locations from 1994-1996 in Ethiopia

No.

Genotypes

Location

Bekoji

Holetta

Adet

Sinana

Kulumsa

1

Global No 40619/2

3707

1805

1555

1327

2360

2

Hu Yu 9/16

3226

1343

1706

1283

2309

3

“ 9/10

3356

1251

1567

1257

2313

4

Consal /1

3652

1416

1626

1439

2405

5

Westar m-2-88/89/2

3346

1357

1711

1467

2331

6

Can you 23/9

3597

1217

1682

1365

2291

7

Can you 23/7

3208

1364

1649

1208

2269

8

Westar 88/89/1

3027

1473

1828

1556

2444

9

Westar M-2. 88/89/6

2827

1207

1820

1611

2459

10

Tower

2819

1356

1913

1469

2410

11

Pura

2692

1298

2060

1515

2386

 

Mean

3196

1372

1912

1419

2362

Table 4. Location mean seed yield (kg ha-1) of 11 rapeseed varieties tested at five locations from 1994-1996 in Ethiopia.

No.

Genotypes

Year

1994

1995

1996

Mean

1

Global No 40619/2

2206

2208

2038

2151

2

Hu Yu 9/16

1964

2136

1920

2007

3

“ 9/10

1755

2207

1884

1949

4

Consal /1

1954

2339

2029

2107

5

Westar m-2-88/89/2

1773

2225

1948

1982

6

Can you 23/9

1919

2205

1968

2031

7

Can you 23/7

1802

2092

1927

1940

8

Westar 88/89/1

1838

2274

2085

2066

9

Westar M-2. 88/89/6

1722

2260

1969

1984

10

Tower

1775

2215

1990

1993

11

Pura

1912

2166

1892

1990

 

Mean

1875

2212

1892

2018

LSD 0.05

Location 271.2 295.8 532.6

Genotype 207.6 NS NS

Location x Genotype 464.2 463.8 388.9

CV% 17.72 15.0 13.96

Table 5. Summary of seed yields (kg/ha) of the released and local varieties in the rapeseed national and extension variety trials grown at 10 sites in four agricultural development zones (ADZ) with 46/69 kg/ha of N and P2O5 fertiliser (F1) or without (F0) 1984-86 in Ethiopia.

Zone

Species

Variety

F1

F0

Central (2)

B. napus

improved

1867

1282

 

B. carinata

local

2724

2144

         

South-eastern(3)

B. napus

improved

1636

683

   

local

1897

1132

         

North-western(4)

B. napus

improved

1630

561

 

B. carinata

local

1699

718

         

Western (1)

B. napus

improved

1553

129

 

B. carinata

local

2018

183

Mean

       
 

B. napus

improved

1621

664

 

B. carinata

local

2085

1044

Table 6. Seed oil content of the rapeseed and local varieties in the rapeseed national variety trials grown at four sites in two (ADZ) in Ethiopia.

Zones

Species

Variety

F1

F0

Central (2)

B. napus

improved

45.9

45.2

 

B. carinata

local

42.2

41.2

         

South-eastern(2)

B. napus

improved

45.9

46.0

 

B. carinata

local

43.0

42.2

Mean

B. napus

improved

45.9

45.6

 

B. carinata

local

42.6

41.7

Table 7. Effect of NP on the seed yield of rapeseed at Sinana combined over two years (1988-1989) in Ethiopia.

P205

 

N kg ha-1

P205 (mean)

 

0

23

46

96

 

Seed yield kg ha-1

0

1420

1330

1440

1850

1510

22

1210

1230

1750

1800

1500

44

1230

1450

1820

1750

1560

88

1250

1760

1650

2180

1710

N(mean)

1280

1440

1670

1990

 
   

N

NP

   

CV%

 

3.2

-

   

LSD 0.5 (kg ha-1

 

2.5

NS

   

SE (+)

 

0.9

-

   

Fig.1. Relative contribution (%) of mean effects (kg ha-1 ) of early sowing (SD1), fertiliser (F+) weeding (W+) and broadcasting (BBR) on seed yield of rapeseed at Holetta and Klumsa (1988-1989).

REFERENCES

1. Badege Gebre, Rezene Fissehaie and A.Stroud. 1986. Preliminary weed research findings on two Ethiopia highland oilseed crops, rapeseed (Brassica napus) and higher (Guizotia abyssinica). PP. 58-65. In: proc. of the third oilcrops network workshop. A.Omran (ed.) Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, 6-10 October, 1986. IDRC, MR 153 (ed) Ottawa, Canada.

2. CSA, Central Statistics authority. 1997. Time series data on area, production and yield of major crops. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

3. Getinet A., Adefris T/W., Mengistu N. and Tesfaye G. 1992 Rapeseed and Gomenzer breeding in Ethiopia. In: proc. of the 1st National oil seeds workshop Dec. 3-5/1991 Addis Ababa pp. 31- 40.

4. Hiruy Belayneh, K.W. Riley, Nigatu Tadesse and Getinet Alemaw.1983. the response of three oilseed Brassica spp. to different planting dates and seed rates in the highlands of Ethiopia. Ethiopian J.Agric.Sci. 5: 22-31.

5. Hiruy Belayneh and Nigussie A. 1988. Comperative performance of Ethiopian mustard (Brassica carinata A.Brau) and Argentine rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) under improved and traditional farming practices. Presented at the 7th International Rapeseed Congress, 11-14 May Poznan Poland.

6. Nigussie Alemayehu and Mesfin A. 1994. Relative importance of some management factors in seed and oil yields of Ethiopian mustard (Brassica carinata Braun.) and rapeseed (B. napus L.). Ethiopian J. Agric. Sci. 14 (1/2) 27-36.

7. Taye Bekele. 1986 Response of oil seed brassica to fertilizers. PP. 40-45. In proc. of the third oil crops network workshop. A. Omran (ed.) Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, 6-10 October, 1986 IDRC, MR 153e, Ottawa, Canada.

Previous PageTop Of PageNext Page