Previous PageTable Of ContentsNext Page

SPATIO-TEMPORAL DYNAMICS OF INSECT DISTRIBUTIONS IN OILSEED RAPE

Ingrid H. Williams1*, Archie K. Murchie2, Andrew W. Ferguson1, Zdzislaw Klukowski3, Joe N. Perry1, Barbara Walczak3 , Moira A. Mugglestone1, Suzanne J. Clark1

1IACR-Rothamsted, Harpenden, Hertfordshire AL5 2JQ, UK * mailto:ingrid.williams@bbsrc.ac.uk ; 2Applied Plant Sciences Division, Department of Agriculture for Northern Ireland and Queen’s University of Belfast, Agriculture and Food Science Centre, Newforge Lane, Belfast BT9 5PX, UK; 3Katedra Entomologii Rolniczej, Akademia Rolnicza, Ul. Cybulskiego 32, 50-205 Wroclaw, Poland

ABSTRACT

Parasitoids can provide effective control of some pests of oilseed rape. Their efficiency is influenced by their spatio-temporal coincidence with their host. Any disociations between their spatial or temporal distributions can provide opportunities to target insecticide against the pest without harming the parasitoid. The cabbage seed weevil, Ceutorhynchus assimilis Paykull, is attacked by the larval ectoparasitoid, Trichomalus perfectus Walker, and parasitism rates often exceed 70%. The spatio-temporal distributions of C. assimilis and its parasitoid within a crop of winter rape were investigated over two years. Insects were sampled using two-dimensional arrays of spatially referenced sampling points. Spatial Analysis by Distance IndicEs (SADIE) and a randomisation procedure were used to describe and compare the patterns of distribution across time and between species. During immigration, adult C. assimilis were aggregated at the edges of the crop, but later were more widespread. Adult parasitoids migrated to the crop later than the host and were not aggregated at the crop edge except briefly during the early phase of immigration. Female adult C. assimilis and C. assimilis larvae were spatially associated, as were densities of C. assimilis larvae and T. perfectus larvae. Integrated pest management strategies for oilseed rape seek to employ judicious use of chemical pesticides, targeted in space and time, together with the enhancement of natural enemies for biological control. The implications of the observed distributions of C. assimilis and T. perfectus for improving such strategies are discussed.

KEYWORD pest, parasitoid, Ceutorhynchus assimilis, Trichomalus perfectus, insecticide targeting

INTRODUCTION

The pteromalid wasp, Trichomalus perfectus (Walker), is an important natural enemy of Ceutorhynchus assimilis Paykull (the cabbage seed weevil) throughout Europe, often killing more than 70% of host larvae (Murchie & Williams, 1998). In the UK, a commercially viable low-cost strategy for the management of C. assimilis populations on winter rape, incorporating T. perfectus, was recently proposed (Alford et al., 1996). It aims to conserve natural populations of T. perfectus by the temporal targeting of insecticide treatments, i.e. the avoidance of post-flowering applications, to reduce their direct impact on the parasitoid. It is based on work by Murchie et al. (1997), who compared the effects on parasitism of two standard insecticide treatments, viz. the pyrethroid insecticide, alphacypermethrin, targeted against adult C. assimilis and applied during flowering, and the organophosphate insecticide, triazophos, targeted against the larvae of C. assimilis and applied post-flowering. Whereas the former treatment had little effect on parasitism rates, being applied before the main migration of T. perfectus into the crop, the latter treatment, applied during the main immigration flight of the parasitoid, reduced parasitism rates substantially. In commercial crops in the UK, the recent decline in the use of triazophos appears to have resulted in substantially increased rates of parasitism of C. assimilis by T. perfectus (Alford et al., 1996). Targeting insecticide treatments to crop area, as well as in time, could offer even greater potential for the reduction of pesticide use and the conservation of T. perfectus. In this paper, we report on two studies of the spatio-temporal distributions of C. assimilis and T. perfectus on winter rape and discuss the implications of our findings for the spatial targeting of insecticide treatments to minimise insecticide use and to conserve the parasitoid.

METHODS

Adult insects were sampled, from late April to mid-July, using traps arranged on selected intersections of a grid (10 m in 1992; 43.5 m in 1995) across crops of winter rape (1.1 ha in 1992; 6.6 ha in 1995). In 1992, water traps (n=23) were used and, in 1995, flight traps (n=36), baited with the host plant volatiles 2-propenyl isothiocyanate and 2-phenylethyl isothiocyanate, were used. Traps were emptied weekly. In early July 1995, numbers of C. assimilis larvae and their parasitism by T. perfectus were assessed in a sample of 400 pods from each of 19 of the trap sites. To visualise the spatial distributions of trapped insects, counts were mapped using Unimap 2000 software (Uniras Ltd., Slough, UK). In 1992, frequency distributions of species were investigated by fitting Taylors’ Power Law (Taylor, 1961) to sample variances and means derived from weekly trap counts. To determine the strength of edge effects, a randomisation test of permuted rearrangements of the counts was used (Perry, 1995; Murchie, 1996). In 1995, the spatial patterns were described using Spatial Analysis by Distance IndicEs (SADIE; Perry & Klukowski, 1997; Perry 1998a;); this describes the spatial pattern of a single set of counts using three indices (Ia, Ja and Ka), for which values greater than unity indicate aggregated arrangement of the counts. Another index, It, (Perry, 1998b) was used to compare two sets of counts; again, values greater than unity indicate positive spatial association.

RESULTS

1992

Distribution of C. assimilis adults. Ceutorhynchus assimilis adults first invaded the crop in late April, reached maximum numbers in early/mid June and declined from early July, with few caught after mid-July; the numbers caught from 8 May to 10 July are given in Table 1. Regression of variance against mean indicated heterogeneity of catches (a = 0.420; b = 1.556). Numbers at the edge were greater than at the centre in early/mid-May, but less so during the second half of May when densities stabilised. In early June, there was a similar marked edge effect. This declined in late June and early July when densities became greatest in two longitudinal regions parallel with the northern and southern edges of the crop.

Distribution of T. perfectus females. Only female T. perfectus were identified from trap samples, because identification of male Pteromalids is difficult. The first females were caught during the first week of May; numbers remained small until early June and then increased steadily until mid-July (Table 1). Regression of variance against mean indicated strong heterogeneity of catches (a = 0.229, b = 1.824). There was a similar marked edge effect in mid-May only, but thereafter more were caught from the centre than from the edge of the crop.

Comparison of distributions of C. assimilis adults and T. perfectus females. The numbers of T. perfectus caught on most occasions were negatively correlated with those of C. assimilis except during mid-May and mid-July. They were also negatively correlated with those of C. assimilis females three weeks earlier, when the host larvae attacked by T. perfectus would have been at the egg stage (T. perfectus on 3 July v. C. assimilis on 12 June r = -0.4855, P = 0.02).

Table 1. Mean numbers of C. assimilis adults and T. perfectus females caught weekly in water traps in 1992; * indicates a significant (P < 0.05) edge effect.

Date trap emptied

Mean no. of C. assimilis per trap

Mean no. of T. perfectus per trap

8 May

19.5*

0.5

15 May

10.9*

2.3*

22 May

12.2

0.9

29 May

15.0

0.6

5 June

13.3*

3.3

12 June

50.1

5.1

19 June

36.7

4.5

26 June

37.4

9.0

3 July

39.7

8.3

10 July

7.1

13.4

1995

Distribution of C. assimilis adults. Mapped counts of C. assimilis adults suggested two main phases of crop colonisation. Invasion began at the south-east and south-west field boundaries (20-25 April) and appeared to spread to other parts of the crop, the two foci almost merging to give a single cluster covering most of the south and, less densely, parts of the north of the crop. Maximum numbers were caught from 16-23 May. Thereafter numbers caught from all parts of the crop declined, with those parts most heavily infested being the last to maintain a population.

Table 2. Analyses of the spatio-temporal distributions of C. assimilis adults caught weekly in flight traps in 1995. * indicates a significant (P < 0.05) degree of aggregation of counts (Ia, Ka) or the presence of a single cluster (Ja) .

Date trap emptied

Mean no. per trap

 

SADIE index

 
   

Ia

Ja

Ka

25 April

0.44

1.62*

1.22

0.99

2 May

0.88

1.49*

0.91

1.03

9 May

1.06

1.94*

1.08

1.08*

16 May

3.50

1.71*

1.14*

1.03

23 May

4.92

1.63*

1.09

1.05

30 May

2.92

1.57*

1.02

1.09*

6 June

1.31

1.40*

1.06

1.01

13 June

0.19

1.52*

1.47

1.03

20 June

0.14

1.51*

3.05*

1.00

SADIE analyses of these distributions (Table 2) indicated that they were strongly and significantly aggregated on all dates (Ia >1). The invasion on two fronts resulted in the index Ja being not significantly greater than unity (Perry, 1998) except near the peak of abundance (9-16 May) and at the end of colonisation (13-20 June). There was also noticeable pattern of smaller scale aggregation, within the south of the field where most C. assimilis were caught, as shown by values of index Ka which were greater than unity especially during May (Perry & Klukowski, 1997).

Comparison of distributions of C. assimilis adults, their larvae and T. perfectus larvae. The sampled distributions of the cumulative total of C. assimilis adults and of their larvae showed some inconsistencies, especially in the northern quarter of the crop where traps caught few adults but plants contained relatively many larvae. Although the correlation coefficient between numbers of adult female and larval C. assimilis was only 0.30, they were spatially associated (It = 1.09, P = 0.025). The distributions of both C. assimilis larvae and T. perfectus larvae appeared to be aggregated into regions at c. 0-80m from crop edges and were strongly associated (It = 1.35, P< 0.003). The mean percentage parasitism was 57% and this did not vary with host density.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS

Grid sampling, together with novel analyses of spatial distributions, has revealed, for the first time, the complexity of the pattern of crop colonisation by C. assimilis, with invasion on multiple fronts, significant aggregation throughout colonisation and on different scales, and a simultaneous decline in infestation from all areas of the crop towards the end of flowering. The pattern of colonisation undoubtedly reflects the interplay of environmental factors, such as the location of overwintering sites and windbreaks relative to the position of the crop and the direction of the wind, with the behavioural responses of the pest, particularly those involved in crop location and host plant selection. Greater understanding of the ways in which these factors determine the distribution patterns of C. assimilis could lead to ways of predicting which areas of a crop are most at risk of infestation.

Although the distributions of adult female and of larval C. assimilis were spatially associated, they were not coincident in all parts of the crop, possibly because flight traps sampled flying rather than ovipositing females. Despite the negative correlations between the numbers of C. assimilis adults and T. perfectus females caught, there was a close spatial association between their respective larvae, with no areas where larvae were not attacked. The latter indicates that presence of the host was the main factor limiting the distribution of the parasitoid; any disparity would have indicated that other factors were also affecting parasitoid distribution. The uniform and large proportion of larvae parasitised over the crop area occupied by the host shows that T. perfectus was effective both in dispersing throughout its host range and in finding its host within that range.

The aggregated nature of the distribution of C. assimilis adults in the crop studied also suggests a potential for targeting insecticide treatment to crop areas where pests are densest, thereby maximising control of the pest while minimising pesticide use. The recommended time for the application of pyrethroid to kill adult C. assimilis on winter rape is during flowering, between 20 pod set and 80% petal fall on the main raceme; this timing avoids the main immigration flights of T. perfectus (Alford et al., 1996). In this study, the crops were between these stages during early- to mid-May. During this period, C. assimilis adults infested only part of the crop area, particularly the crop edge and their density varied considerably within the infested areas. Application of insecticide to the crop edge, would have targeted the pest better than application to the whole crop. At present, determination of within-field densities of crop infestation and the strength of the edge effect is not yet a feasible proposition for the grower or advisor and, therefore, temporal rather than spatio-temporal targeting of insecticide treatments against C. assimilis must remain the prime strategy for protecting T. perfectus (Alford et al., 1996). However, in the future, advances in our knowledge of the environmental factors and behavioural responses determining the spatio-temporal distributions of this pest and its parasitoid, may lead to the development of integrated pest management strategies for oilseed rape incorporating spatially targetted treatments, for example, push-pull or stimulo-deterrent diversion strategies which would incorporate not only spatially targeted insecticides, but also spatially targetted semiochemicals to manipulate the movements and distributions of pest and parasitoid on the crop.

Acknowledgements

We thank HGCA (Oilseeds) and MAFF (LINK Programme: Technologies for Sustainable Farming Systems and MAFF Arable Crops and Horticulture) for financial support. IACR - Rothamsted receives grant-aided support from the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council.

REFERENCES

1. Alford, D.V., Walters, K.F.A., Williams, I.H. & Murchie, A.K. (1996) A commercially viable low-cost strategy for the management of seed weevil populations on winter oilseed rape in the UK. Proceedings of the British Crop Protection Conference, Pests & Diseases, Brighton pp. 609-614.

2. Murchie, A.K. (1996) Parasitoids of cabbage seed weevil and brassica pod midge in oilseed rape. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis. University of Keele, UK.

3. Murchie, A.K. & Williams, I.H. (1998) A bibliography of the parasitoids of the cabbage seed weevil (Ceutorhynchus assimilis Paykull). Bulletin IOBC/WPRS, Integrated Control in Oilseed Crops 21(5): 177-181.

4. Murchie, A.K., Williams, I.H. & Alford, D.V. (1997) Effects of commercial insecticide treatments to winter oilseed rape on parasitism of Ceutorhynchus assimilis Paykull (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) by Trichomalus perfectus (Walker) (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae). Crop Protection 16: 199-202.

5. Perry, J.N. (1995) Spatial analysis by distance indices. Journal of Animal Ecology 64: 303-314.

6. Perry, J.N. (1998a) Measures of Spatial Pattern for Counts. Ecology 79 (3): 1008-1017.

7. Perry, J.N. (1998b) Measures of spatial pattern and spatial association for insect counts. In: Population and Community Ecology for Insect Management and Conservation. eds. J. Baumgartner, P. Brandmayr & B.F.J. Manly). Balkema, Rotterdam. Proceedings of the Ecology and Populaiton Dynamics Section of the 20th International Congress of Entomology, Florence, Italy, 25-31 August 1996. ISBN 90 5410 930 0.

8. Perry, J.N. & Klukowski, Z. (1997) Spatial distributions of counts at the edges of sample areas. Proceedings of the VI Conference of the Biometric Society, Cordoba 21-24 September 1997, pp. 103-108.

9. Taylor, L.R. (1961) Aggregation, variance and the mean. Nature 189: 732-735.

Previous PageTop Of PageNext Page