Previous PageTable Of ContentsNext Page

Interspecific competition between Diadegma semiclausum and Oomyzus sokolowskii, parasitoids of diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella

Zu-hua Shi, Qin-bao Li, Xin Li and Shu-sheng Liu

Institute of Applied Entomology, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310029, China
Corresponding author: shshliu@zju.edu.cn

Abstract

Interspecific competition between Diadegma semiclausum (Hellén) (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae) and Oomyzus sokolowskii (Kurdjumov) (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae) was investigated at 25°C in the laboratory, by exposing III instar larvae of diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella (L.) (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae) to either species alone or exposing the host larvae already exposed to one species to the other. Both D. semiclausum and O. sokolowskii could lay eggs into the host larvae that had previously been parasitised by the other species, leading to occurrence of multiparasitised hosts. When host larvae were exposed first to D. semiclausum and then to O. sokolowskii, and the time intervals between the two exposures were shorter than one day, ensuing parasitoid adults from the multiparasitised host larvae were nearly always D. semiclausum. When host larvae that were first exposed to D. semiclausum and then exposed to O. sokolowskii either immediately or 3-4 days later, immature stages of both parasitoids were found inside the host larvae by dissection. However, at 6-7 days after parasitism by D. semiclausum, only one larva of D. semiclausum remained in each host, suggesting that D. semiclausum physically removed the O. sokolowskii immatures through feeding. When host larvae were first exposed to O. sokolowskii and then exposed to D. semiclausum, the percentage of O. sokolowskii adult emergence increased as the time intervals between the two exposures increased. When host larvae exposed to O. sokolowskii three days previously were exposed to D. semiclausum, no D. semiclausum could survive to adulthood.

Introduction

Interspecific competition is one of the most predominant interspecific interactions and can influence the size and structure as well as the stability of communities (Mackauer 1990). Interspecific competition between parasitoids can be of great importance in the application of biological control (van Alebeek et al. 1993) because it could reduce the potential of parasitoids against target pests (Leveque et al. 1993) and sometimes lead to failure of an introduction of a natural enemy (Pijls et al. 1995).

Diamondback moth (DBM), Plutella xylostella (L.) (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae), is a major pest of crucifer crops worldwide and has developed high resistance to almost all types of insecticides (Talekar & Shelton 1993, Noda et al. 2000). Oomyzus sokolowskii (Kurdjumov) (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae) and Diadegma semiclausum (Hellén) (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae) are two major parasitoids of DBM (Ooi 1988, Wang et al. 1999). They have been introduced into many countries or regions to enhance biological control of DBM (Ooi 1988, Yang et al. 1993, Talekar & Hu 1996, Noda et al. 2000). Because both parasitoids oviposit into DBM larvae, they may compete for hosts. But, as yet, no information is available on their competition. In this study, we observed the oviposition of these species into host larvae already parasitised by the other and determined the development of the two parasitoids in multiparasitised hosts.

Materials and methods

Insects and plants

All insect stock cultures were maintained in temperature-controlled rooms at 25±2˚C, 60-80% RH with a photoperiod of 14:10 (L:D). DBM was originally collected from a cabbage field in a suburb of Hangzhou, China in June 1999. The stock culture of DBM was reared on potted plants of cabbage, Brassica oleracea var capitata, using the method described by Wang et al. (1999).

The stock culture of O. sokolowskii was established from parasitised DBM pupae collected from a cabbage field in a suburb of Hangzhou in July 2000. The culture was maintained using DBM as hosts reared on cabbage plants and had been reared for 5-6 generations prior to the experiments.

The stock culture of D. semiclausum was started from 100 cocoons of the parasitoid from a stock culture at the Institute of Plant Protection, the Academy of Agricultural Sciences of Yunnan Province, China. The institute at Yunnan introduced D. semiclausum from Taiwan in 1997. The culture was maintained using DBM as hosts reared on cabbage plants and had been reared for 4-7 generations prior to experiments.

All parasitoids of both species used in experiments were randomly chosen, mated adult females, at 1-2 days post-emergence. They were provided with 10% honey solution as food. Host larvae used in experiments were in early III instar.

To obtain larvae parasitised by D. semiclausum, we exposed DBM larvae individually to a female parasitoid in a test tube, and observed each of them to be attacked once. With this method, 20-30 attacked larvae could be obtained in half an hour. However, it was not possible to obtain the parasitised larvae by O. sokolowskii with this method because this parasitoid attacked only a few DBM larvae per female per day (Wang et al. 1999). Therefore, we obtained O. sokolowskii parasitised larvae by exposing 30 host larvae to 20 wasps for 24 h.

Oomyzus sokolowskii parasitism of larvae already parasitised by Diadegma semiclausum

Thirty larvae attacked by D. semiclausum in early III instar and 30 healthy host larvae of the corresponding age were exposed either 0 h (immediately after), 48 h, 72 h or 96 h later to 10 female wasps of O. sokolowskii for 24 h. At the end of exposure, 10-15 larvae in each of the replicates were dissected and the numbers of host larvae containing eggs or larvae of the two parasitoid species were recorded. The remaining15-20 larvae were reared until emergence of parasitoids. The numbers of hosts that produced parasitoid adults of either species were recorded. All dead DBM larvae and the pupae that did not produce either moth or parasitoid were dissected to determine whether they had been parasitised by either of the two species.

In a separate test, 30 host larvae attacked by D. semiclausum were exposed either 0 h, 72 h or 96 h later to 10 O. sokolowskii female adults for 24 h. After the exposure, the host larvae were sampled and dissected at 24 h intervals, and the numbers of host larvae containing eggs or larvae of the two parasitoid species were recorded.

Diadegma semiclausum parasitism of host larvae already parasitised by Oomyzus sokolowskii

The experiment design was similar to that described above, but DBM larvae were exposed first to 20 female wasps of Oomyzus sokolowskii for 24 h, then to two D. semiclausum females for 6 h either 0 h, 24 h, 48 h or 72 h later, and series sample dissections at 24 h intervals were made.

Results

Oomyzus sokolowskii parasitism of larvae already parasitised by Diadegma semiclausum

Oomyzus sokolowskii oviposited in the host larvae that had previously been parasitised by D. semiclausum, leading to the occurrence of multiparasitised hosts. Oviposition was not deterred by the presence of eggs or larvae of D. semiclausum in the host larvae (Table 1). Those multiparasitised host larvae had lower survival, and almost all of them failed to produce wasps of O. sokolowskii except when oviposition of O. sokolowskii occurred 48 h after parasitism by D. semiclausum (Table 2). As the parasitised host larvae continued to develop, the percentage of host larvae with O. sokolowskii decreased while that with D. semiclausum remained unchanged. In all three treatments, no O. sokolowskii individuals were found in the multiparasitised larvae on the 6-7th day after parasitism by D. semiclausum (Figure 1 and Figure 2).

Figure 1. Percentage of Plutella xylostella host larvae with parasitoid eggs or larvae when the host larvae were first attacked by Diadegma semiclausum and then immediately exposed to Oomyzus sokolowskii.

Figure 2. Percentage of Plutella xylostella host larvae with parasitoid eggs or larvae when the host larvae were first attacked by Diadegma semiclausum and then exposed to Oomyzus sokolowskii 72 h later.

Table 1. Percentage parasitism by Oomyzus sokolowskii of Plutella xylostella larvae that were already parasitised by Diadegma semiclausum 0-96 h previously

Time in ha

% parasitism of hosts
exposed to both parasitoids by

 

% parasitism of host exposed to

D. semiclausum

O. sokolowskii

 

O. sokolowskii only

0

95.0 ±2.4 (10)b

71.0 ±5.3

 

71.3 ±7.3 (5)

48

93.3 ±3.7 (5)

52.0 ±9.5

 

56.7 ±5.6 (5)

72

98.2 ±1.8 (5)

53.0 ±7.2

 

45.3 ±4.9 (5)

96

98.5 ±1.5 (5)

52.3 ±4.3

 

54.7 ±5.7 (5)

aTime in hours between exposure to Diadegma semiclausum and exposure to Oomyzus sokolowskii.
b
Mean ±standard error; data in parentheses are the number of replicates.

Diadegma semiclausum parasitism of larvae already parasitised by Oomyzus sokolowskii

Although attacks by D. semiclausum on DBM larvae were hasty, almost all attacks (ca. 95%) resulted in parasitism (Table 1). No significant differences were found in percentage of parasitism by D. semiclausum between the host larvae previously exposed to O. sokolowskii and the healthy ones. However, in both treatments and controls, percentage of parasitism by D. semiclausum decreased with the increase of larval age (Table 3).

When oviposition by D. semiclausum occurred after that by O. sokolowskii, the percentage of hosts that produced wasps of D. semiclausum decreased with increase of the intervals between the two oviposition events. When the interval reached 72 h, no adults of D. semiclausum were produced (Table 2).

Table 2. Successful parasitism of Plutella xylostella and adult emergence of Diadegma semiclausum and Oomyzus sokolowskii in relation to oviposition sequence and interval

Host exposure sequence to parasitoidsa

% of host survival to prepupa

Number (%) hosts that produced adults of

D. semiclausum

O. sokolowskii

D-0-O

31.5

52 (96.3)

2 ( 3.7)

D-48-O

9.6

3 (60.0)

2 (40.0)

D-72-O

22.9

6 (85.7)

1 (14.3)

D-96-O

54.4

30 (96.8)

1 ( 3.2)

       

O-0-D

31.6

79 (96.3)

3 ( 3.7)

O-24-D

62.5

18 (75.0)

6 (25.0)

O-48-D

32.8

2 (13.3)

13 (86.7)

O-72-D

35.2

0 ( 0.0)

10 (100)

aD=Diadegma semiclausum, O=Oomyzus sokolowskii, 0, 24, 48, 72, 96 are hours between exposures to two parasitoids, thus D-0-O and D-48-O stand for host exposures to O. sokolowskii 0 or 48 h after exposure to D. semiclausum respectively.

Table 3. Percentage parasitism by Diadegma semiclausum of Plutella xylostella larvae that were already exposed to Oomyzus sokolowskii 0-72 h previously

Time in ha

% parasitism of hosts
exposed to both parasitoids by

 

% parasitism of host exposed to

O. sokolowskii

D. semiclausum

 

D. semiclausum only

0

84.0 ±7.8 (5)b

97.3 ±1.6

 

96.7 ±3.3 (5)b

24

75.6 ±2.2 (5)

68.9 ±5.9

 

66.7 ±5.4 (5)

48

86.7 ±3.0 (5)

57.8 ±11.5

 

54.7 ±8.5 (5)

72

72.5 ±5.6 (5)

51.7 ±4.4

 

49.3 ±8.1 (5)

aTime in hours between exposure to Oomyzus sokolowskii and exposure to Diadegma semiclausum.
b
Mean ±standard error; data in parentheses are the number of replicates

When host larvae were exposed immediately to D. semiclausum after the exposure to O. sokolowskii, the percentage of hosts with D. semiclausum remained high, while that with O. sokolowskii decreased as the parasitised host larvae developed (Figure 3). However, when the hosts were attacked by D. semiclausum after O. sokolowskii had developed for 48 h or 72 h, the percentage of hosts with O. sokolowskii remained virtually unchanged as that with D. semiclausum (Figure 4).

Figure 3. Percentage of Plutella xylostella hosts with parasitoid eggs or larvae when the host larvae were first exposed to Oomyzus sokolowskii and then exposed to Diadegma semiclausum immediately.

Figure 4. Percentages of Plutella xylostella hosts with parasitoid eggs or larvae when the host larvae were first exposed to Oomyzus sokolowskii and then exposed to Diadegma semiclausum 48 h later.

Discussion

Many parasitoids can discriminate between hosts parasitised by conspecific females and those from non-parasitised hosts, but interspecific host discrimination has been rarely reported, particularly for larval parasitoids. As larval parasitoids usually incur strong physical defence from hosts that they attack (Brodeur et al. 1996), host larvae may be too active to be held by parasitoids for sufficient duration to judge whether they had been parasitised. The results obtained in this study demonstrated that both parasitoid species could parasitise host larvae previously parasitised by the other species, no matter whether the first parasitoid was in the egg or the larval stage. Both parasitoid species showed little discrimination and seemed to take the strategy to deposit all their eggs into hosts as soon as possible, to increase their fitness.

Yang et al. (1994) reported that only one parasitoid could survive to adult in one D. semiclausum superparasitised larva. Eggs of D. semiclausum began to hatch 1-2 days after oviposition at 25˚C (Yang et al. 1993). Dissections showed that newly hatched D. semiclausum larvae were swimming in the host haemocoele, suggesting that the early larval stage lived on the materials in the haemolymph. In all treatments where ovipositions by D. semiclausum were followed by O. sokolowskii, and where ovipositions by O. sokolowskii were immediately followed by D. semiclausum, the proportion of hosts with O. sokolowskii reduced sharply after D. semiclausum had developed for 4-5 days. It could be inferred that D. semiclausum killed and swallowed the O. sokolowskii immatures during its late larval stages. On the contrary, when ovipositions by O. sokolowskii were followed by D. semiclausum with 2 or 3 days delay, the proportions of hosts with O. sokolowskii did not change as the host developed. After the host had pupated, they remained suitable for the pupation of O. sokolowskii, but became unfavourable to larval development and survival of D. semiclausum. Therefore, hosts from such treatments produced more O. sokolowskii than D. semiclausum.

Endoparasitoids require sufficient nutrients from their hosts to develop to maturity. One DBM larvae usually support the complete development of 8-10 O. sokolowskii (Ooi 1988, Wang et al. 1999), or one D. semiclausum (Yang et al. 1994). Over use of host material by both parasitoids may be responsible to the low survival rates of multiparasitised host larvae. Although multiparasitism by the two species reduces their fitness, it may not necessarily reduce their effectiveness against DBM because their differential requirements for temperature (Yang et al. 1993, Wang et al. 1999) and possibly other environmental factors may result in niche separation between the two species. However, as O. sokolowskii has a wide range of hosts and is a facultative hyperparasitoid as well as a primary parasitoid, caution must be taken when introduction of this parasitoid into new areas is considered.

Acknowledgements

This study was supported jointly by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Project no. 39870505) and the Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research (Project no. ACIAR CS2/1998/089).

References

Brodeur J, Geervliet JBF & Vet LEM. 1996. The role of host species, age and defensive behaviour on ovipositional decisions in solitary specialist and gregarious generalist parasitoid (Cotesia species). Entomologia experimentalis et Applicata 81, 125-132.

Leveque L, Monge JP, Rojas-Rousse D, van Alebeek F & Huignard J. 1993. Analysis of multiparasitism by Eupelmus vuilleti (Craw) (Eupelmidae) and Dinarmus basalis (Rond) (Pteromalidae) in the presence of one of their common hosts, Bruchidius atrolineatus (Pic) (Coleoptera Bruchidae). Oecologia 94, 272-277.

Mackauer M. 1990. Host discrimination and larval competition in solitary endoparasitoids. In: Critical issues in biological control (eds M Mackauer, LE Ehler & J Roland), Intercept Ltd., Andover, UK, pp.41-62.

Noda T, Miyai S, Takashino, K & Nakamura A. 2000. Density suppression of Plutella xylostella (Lepidoptera: Yponomeutidae) by multiple releases of Diadegma semiclausum (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae) in cabbage fields in Iwate, northern Japan. Applied Entomology and Zoology 35, 557-563.

Ooi PAC. 1988. Laboratory studies of Tetrastichus sokolowskii. Entomophaga 33, 145-152.

Pijls JWAM, Hofker KD, van Staalduinen MJ & van Alphen JJM. 1995. Interspecific host discrimination and competition in Apoanagyrus (Epidinocarsis) lopezi and A.(E.) diversicornis, parasitoids of the cassava mealybug Phenacoccus manihoti. Ecological Entomology 20, 326~332.

Talekar NS & Shelton AM. 1993. Biology, ecology, and management of the diamondback moth. Annual Review of Entomology 38, 275-301.

Talekar NS & Hu WJ. 1996. Characteristics of parasitism of Plutella xylostella (Lep., Plutellidae) by Oomyzus sokolowskii (Hym., Eulophidae). Entomophaga 41, 45-52.

van Alebeek FAN, Rojas-Rousse D & Leveque L. 1993. Interspecific competition between Eupelmus vuilleti and Dinarmus basalis, two solitary ectoparasitoids of Bruchidae larvae and pupae. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 69, 21-31.

Wang XG, Liu SS, Guo SJ & Lin WC. 1999. Effects of host stages and temperature on population parameters of Oomyzus sokolowskii, a larval-pupal parasitoid of Plutella xylostella. BioControl 44, 391-402.

Yang JC, Chu YI & Talekar NS. 1993. Biological studies of Diadegma semiclausum (Hym.: Ichneumonidae), a parasite of diamondback moth. Entomophaga 38, 579-586.

Yang JC, Chu YI & Talekar NS. 1994. Studies on the characteristic of parasitism of Plutella xylostella (Lep.: Plutellidae) by a larval parasite Diadegma semiclausum (Hym.: Ichneumonidae). Entomophaga 39, 397-406.

Previous PageTop Of PageNext Page